District Court Cases in Georgia
Cases 151 - 160 of 163,072
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Turner v. Georgia Cyber Academy, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01841
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Turner
Defendant:
Georgia Cyber Academy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
PPF AMLI Roxboro Rd v. Fox
as 1:2024cv01810
Plaintiff:
PPF AMLI Roxboro Rd doing business as AMLI 3464
Defendant:
Edward Fox
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Vinton Woods LLC v. Brown
as 1:2024cv01823
Plaintiff:
Vinton Woods LLC
Defendant:
Anthony Brown
Petitioner:
Aris Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Munoz v. Turner
as 1:2024cv01829
Plaintiff:
Peter Munoz
Defendant:
Robin Turner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Dinish Inc v. Associated Industries Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Dinish Inc doing business as Economy Inn
Defendant:
Associated Industries Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Blochowicz v. Steinberg et al
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Blochowicz
Defendant:
Jill E. Steinberg, Merrick B. Garland, The United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Taylor v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
James Lamont Taylor
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation and McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
