Hawaii Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 407
Hodges v. State of Hawaii
as 1:2020cv00099
Respondent:
State of Hawaii
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Petitioner:
Harold T. Hodges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schulze v. U. S. Attorney General
as 1:2020cv00090
Petitioner:
Michael F. Schulze
Respondent:
U. S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kaimana v. Kobayashi
as 1:2020cv00048
Respondent:
Hiromichi Kobayashi
Petitioner:
Joseph Kaimana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gilroy v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2020cv00037
Respondent:
Amy M. Murikami, Melvin H. Fujino, Paul R. Mow and others
Petitioner:
William Gilroy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Libero v. State of Hawaii
as 1:2020cv00019
Respondent:
State of Hawaii
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Petitioner:
James Libero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ciacci v. United States Probation Office District of Hawaii et al
as 1:2019cv00672
Petitioner:
Michael K. Ciacci
Respondent:
United States Probation Office District of Hawaii and USPO Hawaii Supervision Officer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Heidenfeldt v. Kobayashi
as 1:2019cv00639
Respondent:
Hiromichi Kobayashi
Petitioner:
Gary M. Heidenfeldt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Depaepe v. State of Hawaii
as 1:2019cv00566
Respondent:
State of Hawaii
Petitioner:
Sean P. Depaepe
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Schulze v. Kobayashi
as 1:2019cv00558
Petitioner:
Michael F. Schulze
Respondent:
Hiromichi Kobayashi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gilroy et al v. Kona Community Hospital Behavioral Health Authorities, The
as 1:2019cv00554
Respondent:
Kona Community Hospital Behavioral Health Authorities, The, Richard McDowell, Bruce Anderson and others
Petitioner:
William M. Gilroy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
