Hawaii Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 407
Brisken v. Hawaii
as 1:2019cv00524
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Respondent:
Hawaii
Petitioner:
Jhon Brisken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burns v. State of Hawaii Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv00518
Respondent:
Peter Cabreros and State of Hawaii Corp.
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Petitioner:
Nicholas Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ciacci v. United States Probation Office
as 1:2019cv00476
Respondent:
United States Probation Office
Petitioner:
Michael K. Ciacci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gilroy v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2019cv00479
Plaintiff:
William Gilroy
Defendant:
Amy M. Murikami, Melvin H. Fujino, Clare E. Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Espinda
as 1:2019cv00478
Respondent:
dir dps Nolan P Espinda
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Petitioner:
Maunu Renah Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brisken v. State of Hawaii
as 1:2019cv00475
Respondent:
State of Hawaii
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Petitioner:
Jhon Brisken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez v. Thomas
as 1:2019cv00457
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Respondent:
Todd Thomas
Petitioner:
Marshall Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Freitas v. Kobayashi
as 1:2019cv00388
Petitioner:
John Ferdinand Freitas
Respondent:
Hiromichi Kobayashi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grandinetti v. Circuit Court of the Third Circuit et al
as 1:2019cv00384
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti, Francis P. Grandinetti and Francis A. Grandinetti
Defendant:
County of Hawaii, C&C of Honolulu, Judiciary, State of Hawaii and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hirano v. Zhang
as 1:2019cv00355
Petitioner:
Douglas A. Hirano
Respondent:
Lucy Zhang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
