Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 827
Sullivan v. Donathan et al
as 4:2023cv04210
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sullivan
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Erin Posey and Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Street v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv16308
Plaintiff:
Carl Street
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Doctor of Division 8, Medical Doctor of Cook County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Caskey et al
as 2:2023cv02265
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bell
Defendant:
Herbert Caskey, Liberty Health Case Corporation and Other Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Keithley et al
as 4:2023cv04208
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
Tracy Keithley, A Hoyt, S Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls v. Jumper
as 4:2023cv04206
Plaintiff:
William Walls
Defendant:
Shaun Jumper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Donathan et al
as 4:2023cv04203
Plaintiff:
Milton Anderson
Defendant:
Gregory Donathan, C. Parsons and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Pritzker et al
as 4:2023cv04205
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Kwame Raoul, Gregg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. Pipper et al
as 4:2023cv04198
Plaintiff:
Donnie R Barrett
Defendant:
Thomas Pipper, Michael Hankins, Elliott Turpin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Racanelli v. Reische
as 4:2023cv04196
Plaintiff:
Joseph Racanelli
Defendant:
Amanda Reische
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Racanelli v. Pritizker et al
as 4:2023cv04197
Plaintiff:
Joseph Racanelli
Defendant:
J B Pritizker, Kwame Raoul, Gregg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
