Southern District of Indiana Torts - Injury Cases

Federal Employers Liability Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 75
LESTER v. INDIANA RAIL ROAD COMPANY
as 2:2015cv00021
Defendant: INDIANA RAIL ROAD COMPANY
Plaintiff: BRIAN G. LESTER
Cause Of Action: Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
PARKER v. CSX TRANSPORATION INC
as 1:2014cv00348
Defendant: CSX TRANSPORATION INC
Plaintiff: JOHN W. PARKER
Cause Of Action: Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
OBERMILLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2013cv00189
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: ELOISE R. OBERMILLER
Cause Of Action: Federal Tort Claims Act
COOK v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 3:2013cv00025
Defendant: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Plaintiff: GARY COOK
Cause Of Action: Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
COPELAND v. USA et al.
as 3:2012cv00178
Plaintiff: TOMMY COPELAND, ESTATE OF WANDA COPELAND
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Federal Tort Claims Act
OSKINS v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 1:2012cv01381
Plaintiff: DONALD L OSKINS
Defendant: CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
ROHRER v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 1:2012cv01382
Plaintiff: JOHN ROHRER
Defendant: CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: Railway Labor Act
GREENE v. INDIANA RAIL ROAD COMPANY
as 2:2012cv00279
Defendant: INDIANA RAIL ROAD COMPANY
Plaintiff: DANNY C. GREENE
Cause Of Action: Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
COLUMBUS REGIONAL HOSPITAL v. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY et al
as 1:2011cv01250
Defendant: CLIFF HANSON, PETE HOWELL, GRANT MCFAYDEN and others
Plaintiff: COLUMBUS REGIONAL HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: Tort Claim
JONES v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 1:2011cv00777
Defendant: CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Plaintiff: CHARLES L. JONES
Cause Of Action: Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.