Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases

Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 8,520
Moorman v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2025cv00004
Defendant: Schmidt, Liaw and Patel
Plaintiff: Kir Moorman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCFADDEN v. JACOBS-CAMBELL et al
as 2:2025cv00009
Defendant: KAYLA KELLEMS, ELIZABETH BENNETT, CASEY JACOBS-CAMBELL and others
Plaintiff: ANDRE MICHAEL MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Tokars et al
as 3:2025cv00007
Plaintiff: Rodolfo Antonio Lopez, Jr
Defendant: Indiana State of, WSBT 22 News Station and Leanne Tokars
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Trump
as 3:2025cv00008
Plaintiff: Rodolfo Antonio Lopez, Jr
Defendant: Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Puerto Rico
as 3:2025cv00009
Plaintiff: Rodolfo Antonio Lopez, Jr
Defendant: Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Miami Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2025cv00016
Defendant: Bites, Miami Correctional Facility and Berry
Plaintiff: Terrance L Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross v. Long et al
as 3:2025cv00017
Plaintiff: William Elias Jacob Cross and William Cross
Defendant: Bennett, Washington, Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oldham v. English et al
as 3:2025cv00014
Defendant: John Doe and Brian English
Plaintiff: James Oldham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartole v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2025cv00001
Plaintiff: Marcus T Bartole and Marcus Bartole
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Reagle et al
as 3:2024cv01010
Defendant: Reich, Longhorn, Christianson and others
Plaintiff: Imari Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?