US District Court for the District of Kansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 6,827
Wilson v. Harlan
as 5:2024cv03164
Plaintiff:
Benjamin W. Wilson
Defendant:
Daniel Harlan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Wiles
as 5:2024cv03163
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Roberts
Defendant:
Truman Wiles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. Hayden et al
as 5:2024cv03161
Petitioner:
Ronald G. Crayton, Jr.
Respondent:
Daryl W. Reece and Calvin H. Hayden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Escalante v. Droege et al
as 5:2024cv03160
Defendant:
Charles James Droege and Gregory Goheen
Plaintiff:
Matthew Aaron Escalante
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waterman v. Cherokee County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners et al
as 5:2024cv03159
Defendant:
Michelle Tippie, D. Ackley, (fnu) Eshelman and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Michael Waterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castaneda v. State of Kansas
as 5:2024cv03157
Petitioner:
Joshua R Castaneda
Respondent:
State of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. (lnu) et al
as 5:2024cv03158
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Jones
Defendant:
(fnu) (lnu) and A.I.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Cole
as 5:2024cv03156
Respondent:
Shawnee County Jail and Brian Cole
Petitioner:
Joseph Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bottom v. Ackerman et al
as 5:2024cv03155
Defendant:
Timothy D. Ackerman and Timothy Anderson
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Bottom, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2024cv03154
Defendant:
Seth Osborn, Progress Review Panel, Kansas, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Ryan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
