US District Court for the District of Kansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 6,711
Demos v. Trump
as 5:2024cv03011
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Waters v. Naylor
as 5:2024cv03012
Plaintiff:
Randall S. Waters
Defendant:
Kansas, State of and Robert D. Naylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia (ID 6002627) v. Dietrich et al
as 5:2024cv03010
Plaintiff:
Ray Floyd Garcia, Jr.
Defendant:
Brenda Dietrich, David Haley, Carolyn McGinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia (ID 6002627) v. Centurion et al
as 5:2024cv03008
Plaintiff:
Ray Floyd Garcia, Jr.
Defendant:
Centurion and Lindzie R. Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Szewc et al
as 5:2024cv03009
Plaintiff:
Kodi Lee Taylor
Defendant:
Lily Szewc, Njeri Mwangi, Mark Dupree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hazelbower v. Payne
as 5:2024cv03007
Petitioner:
Jameson T. Hazelbower
Respondent:
Kevin Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Suggs v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2024cv03006
Plaintiff:
Mardi Terome Suggs
Defendant:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv03005
Petitioner:
Nicholas Griffin
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brockman v. Ormsby et al
as 5:2024cv03004
Plaintiff:
Chester Brockman
Defendant:
Austin Ormsby and D. Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Ouachita River Correctional Unit
as 5:2024cv03003
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Dewayne Moore
Defendant:
Ouachita River Correctional Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
