US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 172
Daniels v. Noyola et al
as 1:2014cv00141
Plaintiff:
Steven Philip Daniels, Jr.
Defendant:
Anna Noyola, Adam Likens, Loretta Coopage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boykin v. Louisville Metropolitan Department of Corrections
as 3:2014cv00648
Plaintiff:
Brad Boykin
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Corrections Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiley-Stiger v. O'Bannon et al
as 3:2014cv00295
Plaintiff:
Pamela Wiley-Stiger
Defendant:
Edwin O'Bannon, Colby Noland and Mark E. Bolton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Means v. Brown et al
as 4:2014cv00032
Plaintiff:
David Means
Defendant:
Alan Brown, Patti Webb, Angela Hampton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benton v. City Correction Complex
as 3:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
David Lewis Benton, Sr.
Defendant:
City Corrections Complex
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Porter v. Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2013cv00923
Plaintiff:
Antwain Rashawn Porter
Defendant:
Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government, City of Louisville, Louisville Metropolitan Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Oliver v. Chester et al
as 3:2013cv00820
Plaintiff:
Antwane B. Oliver
Defendant:
Deputy Chester, Jamie Underwood, Deputy Gary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernandez v. Rolley et al
as 4:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Carlos Fernandez
Defendant:
Rolley, Vaught, Ovalton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calloway v. Logan County Detention Center et al
as 1:2013cv00085
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Calloway
Defendant:
Logan County Detention Center and Bill Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oakley v. Hopkins County Jail
as 4:2013cv00037
Plaintiff:
Michael Oakley
Defendant:
Hopkins County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
