Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 1,572
Simpson v. Day et al
as 5:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Joshua Emmanuel Simpson
Defendant:
Connie Day, Dan Brown, Craig Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couch v. Clay County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
Clay County Detention Center, Linda Smallwood, Kevin Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNichols v. McKenzie et al
as 0:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond McNichols
Defendant:
Shawn McKenzie, Brian Dickerson, Joshua Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNichols v. Bradley et al
as 0:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond McNichols
Defendant:
David Bradley, Ivan Know, Shawn McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNichols v. Armark Corp. et al
as 0:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond McNichols
Defendant:
Armark Corp., Theresa Gullett and Adam Bare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Mills et al
as 3:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Shileka P. Hill
Defendant:
Shift Command Mills, Officer Quinnett, Officer Mondeli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Mills et al
as 5:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Shileka P. Hill
Defendant:
Shift Command Mills, Officer Quinnett, Officer Mondeli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nickerson v. Logan County Detention Center
as 1:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Matthew Andrew Nickerson
Defendant:
Logan County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Mock
as 5:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dawson
Defendant:
Delsa Mock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Irvin v. Taylor et al
as 5:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Thomas Irvin
Defendant:
Barry Taylor, James Ashley, Jorge Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
