US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 697
Pleasant v. District Attorney's Office
as 3:2023cv00594
Plaintiff:
Elmer Pleasant, Jr.
Defendant:
District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Regan
as 3:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
Cornelius Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trackling v. Letcher
as 3:2023cv00574
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Trackling
Defendant:
Unknown Letcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trackling v. Officer
as 3:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Trackling
Defendant:
Unknown Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Tangipahoa Parish Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00573
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. Williams
Defendant:
Tangipahoa Parish Jail, Walgreens, Inc. and Turn Key Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricks v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2023cv00560
Plaintiff:
Wesley Ricks
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Louisiana State Bar Association, District Attorneys Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Tangipahoa Parish Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Calvin Thomas Brown
Defendant:
Tangipahoa Parish Jail and Turn Key Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trackling v. Emory
as 3:2023cv00558
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Trackling
Defendant:
Jonthan Emory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Louisiana State Penitentiary
as 3:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
Caleb Joshua Armstrong
Defendant:
Louisiana State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00540
Plaintiff:
Antoine Edwards
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety & Corrections, Tim Hooper, Christopher Cador and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
