Maine Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 505
SMITH v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00328
Plaintiff:
JAMES C SMITH, JR and JAYMIE DAVIS
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CAPTAIN LANE FELDMAN, SARGEANT GEORGE CARTER and others
Interested Party:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEWART v. MASON et al
as 1:2021cv00321
Plaintiff:
JOHN B STEWART
Defendant:
KEN MASON, KURT KARLSSON, BRYAN SLANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILCOX v. MAGNUSSON et al
as 1:2021cv00305
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY T WILCOX
Defendant:
MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, RANDALL LIBERTY and MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REED v. T S et al
as 1:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
GLENN REED
Defendant:
T S, DEPUTY MEARL REED, CARRIE STONE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MORSE v. DOUGLAS et al
as 2:2021cv00282
Plaintiff:
SONNY JAMES MORSE
Defendant:
WAYNE DOUGLAS, KATRYN LOFTUS SLATTERY, SHIRA BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMEDILE v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2021cv00269
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW SMEDILE
Defendant:
DR ROBINSON and DOE
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. COSTELLO et al
as 2:2021cv00258
Plaintiff:
MARK GRAHAM
Defendant:
CAPTAIN DAVID COSTELLO, LT JORDAN, SGT FLECHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARREN v. MAGUIRE et al
as 1:2021cv00200
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN WARREN
Defendant:
SEAN MAGUIRE, MAJOR CORY SWOPE, SHANNON POOLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LARSEN v. AROOSTOOK MENTAL HEALTH CENTER
as 1:2021cv00157
Defendant:
AROOSTOOK MENTAL HEALTH CENTER
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A LARSEN, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LARSEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00156
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A LARSEN, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
