Massachusetts Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 2,613
Wood v. Boncher
as 1:2022cv11436
Petitioner:
Dale Scott Wood
Respondent:
Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reyes v. Boncher
as 1:2022cv11402
Petitioner:
Juan Reyes
Respondent:
Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lee v. Alves
as 1:2022cv11379
Petitioner:
Brian Lee
Respondent:
Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierro v. Boncher
as 4:2022cv11360
Petitioner:
Christopher James Pierro
Respondent:
Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ferreira v. Alves
as 1:2022cv11352
Petitioner:
Antonio M. Ferreira
Respondent:
Superintendent Nelson B Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Boncher
as 1:2022cv11355
Petitioner:
George Lee
Respondent:
A. Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Watson v. Dolan et al
as 1:2022cv11287
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Byron Watson
Defendant:
Edward Dolan
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. Boncher
as 1:2022cv11214
Petitioner:
Cameron J. Bell
Respondent:
Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Giacomuzzi v. Carter
as 4:2022cv40090
Petitioner:
Meghan Giacomuzzi
Respondent:
Warden, FMC Carswell, Ricardo R. Carter and Thomas Fischer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Velasquez v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv11217
Petitioner:
Ariel Omar Velasquez
Respondent:
Merrick B Garland, United States Marshal Service and Daniel Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
