Massachusetts Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 101 - 110 of 2,610
Smith v. Lynds
as 1:2023cv10025
Petitioner: Timothy Smith
Respondent: Joann M. Lynds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nesbitt v. Superintendent
as 1:2022cv12165
Petitioner: Ralph Nesbitt
Respondent: Superintendent and Superintendent Shawn Zoldak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Boncher
as 1:2022cv12156
Petitioner: Rhinelander Hernandez
Respondent: Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Santos v. Divris We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv40149
Petitioner: Joshua Santos
Respondent: Superintendent Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trotto v. Rodrigues
as 1:2022cv12058
Plaintiff: Matteo Trotto
Respondent: Michael Rodrigues
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aguiar v. Boncher
as 1:2022cv12041
Petitioner: Stephen Aguiar
Respondent: Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Northrop v. Boncher
as 1:2022cv12040
Petitioner: Aaron Northrop
Respondent: Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Horne v. Boncher
as 1:2022cv12027
Petitioner: Anthony W. Horne
Respondent: Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gonsalves v. Rodrigues
as 1:2022cv11994
Petitioner: Antwan Gonsalves
Respondent: Michael Rodrigues
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mahoney v. Krueger
as 1:2022cv11969
Petitioner: Brian Mahoney
Respondent: Jeffrey Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?