District Court Cases in Massachusetts
Cases 71 - 80 of 67,300
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11051
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Banty v. Executive Consulting Group, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv11045
Plaintiff:
KARL BANTY
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE CONSULTING GROUP, LLC dba ECG MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Grafenberg v. Executive Consulting Group, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv11047
Plaintiff:
JESSIE GRAFENBERG
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE CONSULTING GROUP, LLC dba ECG CONSULTANTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Vazquez v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv30056
Plaintiff:
Soveida M. Vazquez
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
De La Paz v. 2U, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv11049
Plaintiff:
Henry De La Paz
Defendant:
2U, Inc. and edX, LLC
J'Adore, LLC v. Morgan et al
as 1:2024cv11038
Plaintiff:
J'Adore, LLC
Defendant:
Jonathan Morgan and JB Morgan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Stile Societa Cooperativa v. Brickman et al
as 1:2024cv11040
Plaintiff:
Stile Societa Cooperativa
Defendant:
Howard Brickman and Brickman Consulting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Melendez v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2024cv11036
Plaintiff:
Patricia Melendez
Defendant:
Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maurice v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11037
Plaintiff:
Craig Maurice
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lipscomb v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2024cv11044
Plaintiff:
William Lipscomb
Defendant:
Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
