Michigan Civil Rights Cases
Cases 221 - 230 of 9,992
Cunegin v. Keller et al
as 2:2024cv10252
Plaintiff:
Bobbie J. Cunegin
Defendant:
J. Keller, K. Detemer, Rollet Raymond and others
Hoppe v. Valeo North America, Inc.
as 2:2024cv10236
Counter Defendant:
David Hoppe
Counter Claimant:
Valeo North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Merida v. Inkster, City of et al
as 2:2024cv10238
Plaintiff:
Jha-Don Merida
Defendant:
City of Inkster, City of Inkster Police Department, Officer, Tavon Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Harper v. Uwanaka
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Aqueis Harper
Defendant:
Tokie R. Uwanaka and Tokie Uwanaka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McCall, Jr. v. Benzie, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Mccall, Jr.
Defendant:
Benzie County, Joshua Rubin, Crystal Lake Township and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Zeeland, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Toriyon D. Mitchell
Defendant:
Zeeland, City of and Matt Bowyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prysok v. National Park Service
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Christopher Prysok
Defendant:
National Park Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Benson et al v. Hearn Industrial Services Inc.
as 2:2024cv10229
Plaintiff:
Kyle Benson, Edwin Sanchez and Darryl Wilcox
Defendant:
Hearn Industrial Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Erbert v. Troy Design & Manufacturing Co.
as 2:2024cv10233
Plaintiff:
Daniel Erbert
Defendant:
Troy Design & Manufacturing Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davis et al v. Berrien, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Melvin Davis, Sr., Charase Dorsey, Anisha Bird and others
Defendant:
Berrien, County of, Steve Pierangeli, Mark Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
