Michigan Civil Rights Cases
Cases 211 - 220 of 9,945
Woodford v. Walden et al
as 2:2024cv10062
Plaintiff:
Darryl Dominic Woodford
Defendant:
Jonathan Walden and Raymond Nichols
Pennell v. Arrowood et al
as 2:2024cv10045
Plaintiff:
Sharon Marie Pennell
Defendant:
Paul E Arrowood and Bryan L Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Pennell v. Arrowood et al
as 1:2024cv10048
Plaintiff:
Sharon Marie Pennell
Defendant:
Paul E Arrowood and Bryan Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Ragless v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv10050
Plaintiff:
Kyle Ragless
Defendant:
Christopher Jones and Michael Olsaver
Black v. Eastpointe Community Schools et al
as 4:2024cv10032
Plaintiff:
Leah Black
Defendant:
Eastpointe Community Schools and Christina Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Thomas v. Kalamazoo Public Safety Department et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Courtney Thomas
Defendant:
Kalamazoo Public Safety Department, Sydney Garner, Mitchell Vorick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Hague v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jannah Hague
Defendant:
Kent County, Michelle LaJoye-Young, Kent County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Wroblewski v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2024cv10011
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Wroblewski
Defendant:
City of Detroit, County of Wayne, James Diguiseppe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leschinski v. Canton, Township of et al
as 2:2024cv10012
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Leschinski
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF CANTON, OFFICER BRANDON HAYFORD, ALEXIS DIVETTA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
People of the State of Michigan v. Rambo El
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
People of the State of Michigan
Defendant:
Rambo El doing business as Blackhawk Express Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 Petition for Removal- Criminal Case Re: Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
