Michigan Civil Rights Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 18,605
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicappers
Kennedy et al v. Michigan Secretary of State et al
as 2:2024cv11072
Plaintiff:
John F. Kennedy, III and Ramon Jackson
Defendant:
Michigan Secretary of State, Detroit Department of Elections, Detroit Clerk and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv11074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hollingsworth v. Walmart
as 1:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Hollingsworth, III
Defendant:
Walmart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hollingsworth v. Civil Rights Department Office of Grand Rapids, Michigan et al
as 1:2024cv00412
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Hollingsworth, III
Defendant:
Civil Rights Department Office of Grand Rapids, Michigan and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
