Minnesota Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 2,760
Dixon v. Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2023cv03312
Petitioner:
Nikita Dixon
Respondent:
Department of Corrections, Commissioner Paul Schnell and Warden Tracy Beltz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv03227
Petitioner:
Howard Young
Respondent:
Warden B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Marin-Angel v. Segal
as 0:2023cv03209
Petitioner:
Juana Marin-Angel
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martinez v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv03178
Petitioner:
Francisco Martinez
Respondent:
Warden B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Clinkenbeard v. King
as 0:2023cv03151
Petitioner:
Robert Clinkenbeard
Respondent:
Mark King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Purdy v. James et al
as 0:2023cv03148
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Colin Purdy
Respondent:
Kendal James, Ned G. Wohlman and Jordan DePonty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jokhoo v. Wohlman et al
as 0:2023cv03022
Petitioner:
Khemall Jokhoo
Respondent:
Ned G. Wohlman, Kendall James, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv02866
Petitioner:
Darrell D. Smith
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cheng v. Rardin
as 0:2023cv02852
Petitioner:
Sheng-Wen Cheng
Respondent:
Warden Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tizoc v. Rardin
as 0:2023cv02819
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Tizoc
Respondent:
Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.