US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Cases 161 - 170 of 17,545
Davis v. USA
as 3:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Galvin Dwayne Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McCray v. USA
as 3:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Marquis Devon McCray
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
McGaughy v. Fordice et al
as 3:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Mario Rodricus McGaughy
Defendant:
Kirk Fordice, Attorney General Mike Moore, Board of Supervisors Lee County 1996-1998 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Roop v. Itawamba County Jail, et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Milford Lee Roop
Defendant:
Itawamba County Courthouse, Itawamba County Jail, Prentiss County Courthouse and Parole And Probation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Shira Scott
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
United States of America v. Pugh
as 3:2024cv00042
Defendant:
Shanderius Pugh and Shanderius Porche Pugh
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America v. Williams
as 3:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Williams
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Davis v. MDOC Offender Service Dept. et al
as 4:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Davis
Defendant:
MDOC Offender Service Dept., Mrs Garner, Shamia Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
