Missouri Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 7,022
Nutall v. Ekstam et al
as 2:2024cv04178
Defendant:
Teena Ekstam and Division of Probation and Parole
Plaintiff:
Willie James Nutall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Doe et al
as 6:2024cv03290
Defendant:
John Doe
Plaintiff:
Wayne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Parker v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv01300
Defendant:
State of Missouri and Department of Mental Health
Plaintiff:
Raevon Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardin v. Moss
as 4:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Justin W Hardin
Defendant:
Stephen C Moss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bradford v. Hayward et al
as 4:2024cv01293
Defendant:
Doug Burris, Charles McKnight, Nathaniel Hayward and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Antony Bradford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gastreich v. Bollinger County, Missouri et al
as 1:2024cv00177
Defendant:
Bollinger County, Missouri, Jackie Wilson, Tom Van Devan and others
Plaintiff:
Kurt Gastreich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. Missouri Department of Revenue
as 2:2024cv04170
Plaintiff:
Darrel R Fisher
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Revenue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Taylor v. Dunklin County et al
as 1:2024cv00175
Defendant:
Hayti Hospital, State of Missouri and Dunklin County
Plaintiff:
J.W. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irving v. Drope et al
as 4:2024cv01288
Defendant:
T. Anderson, Tim Freeman, Makala Drope and others
Plaintiff:
William Irving
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Gornik
as 4:2024cv01289
Defendant:
Maureen W. Gornik
Plaintiff:
Mario B. Long, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
