District Court Cases in Missouri
Cases 151 - 160 of 95,325
Incrediblebank v. Belt Entertainment, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv06054
Plaintiff:
Incrediblebank
Defendant:
Belt Entertainment, LLC, Michael D White and Jeny L. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Malinowski v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
as 5:2024cv06055
Plaintiff:
Jana Malinowski
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company and Cerner Corporation Foundations Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Campo v. Dolgencorp LLC
as 6:2024cv03111
Plaintiff:
Angela Campo
Defendant:
Dolgencorp LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Johnson v. Doe I et al
as 6:2024cv03116
Plaintiff:
Wayne T Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mooney et al v. Hussmann Corporation
as 4:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
S. Mooney and Panasonic Corporation of North America
Defendant:
Hussmann Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
