Nebraska Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 221 - 230 of 3,674
Npimnee v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2023cv00169
Petitioner:
Hope Npimnee
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cleveland v. Sarpy County Police
as 8:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Markus Cleveland
Defendant:
Sarpy County Police and Officer Walkewizc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez Lopez v. Douglas County Prosecutors Office et al
as 8:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Din G. Chavez Lopez
Defendant:
Douglas County Prosecutors Office and Douglas County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lorenzona
as 8:2023cv00166
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Lorenzona, Jr.
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez-Garcia v. Sabatka-Rine
as 8:2023cv00157
Petitioner:
David Gonzalez-Garcia
Respondent:
Diane Sabatka-Rine
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Eberhardt et al
as 8:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Kevin G. Smith
Defendant:
Rick Eberhardt, Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. USA
as 4:2023cv03061
Petitioner:
Erika Vargas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rooks-Byrd v. Jeffreys
as 8:2023cv00147
Petitioner:
Antonio D. Rooks-Byrd
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lockett v. Meyers
as 8:2023cv00148
Petitioner:
Eric Lockett
Respondent:
Micheal Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Diggs v. D.O.C.
as 8:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Darnell Diggs
Defendant:
D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.