New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 15,041
Gentry v. Schneider
as 1:2024cv00541
Respondent:
A. Schneider
Petitioner:
Matthew Gentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quinn v. Miller
as 9:2024cv00733
Petitioner:
Richard Quinn
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lehmann v. Erie County Department of Social Services et al
as 1:2024cv00531
Respondent:
Kellie Poynton-Gallagher, Marie Cannon and Erie County Department of Social Services
Petitioner:
John Calvin Seth Lehmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Perez Sanchez v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv04023
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Ovidio Perez Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hunter v. Wolcott
as 1:2024cv00529
Respondent:
Superintendent Wolcott
Petitioner:
Jerrod Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jimenez v. Jane/John Doe
as 1:2024cv04281
Petitioner:
Pedro Jimenez
Respondent:
Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Alfonso v. Titus
as 6:2024cv06341
Petitioner:
Santiago Alfonso
Respondent:
Superintendent A. Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Latimore v. Clinton County
as 1:2024cv04276
Petitioner:
Theodore Latimore
Respondent:
Clinton County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sistrunk v. Towns
as 1:2024cv04054
Petitioner:
Eric Sistrunk
Respondent:
Darryl C. Towns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Payne v. Superintendent
as 6:2024cv06334
Respondent:
Superintendent
Petitioner:
Chanikka Davis Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
