New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 14,929
Garcia v. Wolcott
as 6:2023cv06718
Petitioner:
Frank Garcia
Respondent:
J. Wolcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Commonwealth of Pennyslvania
as 1:2023cv10902
Petitioner:
Tonia Scott
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennyslvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 1:2023cv10901
Petitioner:
Keeba Harris
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gooden v. Titus
as 6:2023cv06709
Petitioner:
United States Ex Rel Karl Gooden
Respondent:
Superintendent A. Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shabazz v. Kopp
as 1:2023cv10907
Petitioner:
Malik Shabazz
Respondent:
M. Kopp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mercado v. Howard
as 1:2023cv10958
Petitioner:
Oscar Mercado
Respondent:
David Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cole v. Clinton
as 9:2023cv01555
Petitioner:
John W. Cole
Respondent:
J. Clinton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sevillano-Quinonez v. F.C.I. Otisville (Warden)
as 1:2023cv10799
Petitioner:
Romulo Genaro Sevillano-Quinonez
Respondent:
F.C.I. Otisville (Warden)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ngozi-Sieuliau v. Peters
as 1:2023cv09161
Petitioner:
Ansanyi Anequayke Ngozi-Sieuliau doing business as John Sidney
Respondent:
Director Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vazquez-Diaz v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv10639
Petitioner:
Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.