US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 2,069
Edge v. United States of America et al
as 7:2024cv01086
Defendant:
United States of America, Robin Kelleher, Oak Island Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Nigel Max Edge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis v. Bowling et al
as 7:2024cv01077
Defendant:
Brian Chism, Blake Young, Keith Bowling and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lyndell Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Parks v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2024cv00636
Defendant:
Estella Patterson, L K Ferguson and City of Raleigh
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cortez Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. State of North Carolina, et al.
as 5:2024cv00631
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Roy Cooper
Petitioner:
Derrick Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Allen v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2024cv00632
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Roy Cooper
Petitioner:
Derrick Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2024cv00629
Respondent:
Roy Cooper and State of North Carolina
Petitioner:
Derrick Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Qu v. North Carolina State University Raleigh
as 5:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Luping Qu
Defendant:
North Carolina State University Raleigh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Ashmon v. Dance
as 4:2024cv00154
Defendant:
Unknown Surety Company and Paula S. Dance
Plaintiff:
Duane Ashmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Ashmon v. Dance -
as 5:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
duane ashmon
Defendant:
Paula S. Dance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Williams v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Theodore Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.