US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Social Security Cases

Supplemental Security Income Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 101 - 110 of 818
COLLINS v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01137
Plaintiff: LAURA COLLINS
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
LEA v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01141
Plaintiff: MIRANDA LEA
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
KESLER v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01134
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff: CASSIE KESLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
HUTCHENS v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01104
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: BRADLEY NEAL HUTCHENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
CLARKSTON v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01103
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: CHARLES RAY CLARKSTON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
ROBERTS v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01036
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff: SCOTTIE RAY ROBERTS SR and SCOTTIE RAY ROBERTS, SR.
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
HEAD v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01009
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: SUSIE HEAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
KING v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01008
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff: HUBERT KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
MOORE v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00999
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: BARRY KEVIN MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
ESPINOZA v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00894
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: CHARLOTTE APRIL ESPINOZA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?