US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Social Security Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 818
MILES v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00321
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
RODERICK L. MILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
BUMPERS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2021cv00318
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
GENEVA BUMPERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
FULP v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00310
Plaintiff:
RICHARD O. FULP, JR.
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
PERRYMAN v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00305
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY PERRYMAN
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GAMBOUR v. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES et al
as 1:2021cv00292
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES and ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
ARNJAD AHMED MOHAMED KHAIR GAMBOUR and AMJAD AHMED MOHAMED KHAIR GAMBOUR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FOX v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00293
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
MICHELE FOX
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
BOWLES v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00243
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER BOWLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
REYNOLDS v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00199
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
WENDY LEE REYNOLDS
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
D.J. v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00193
Plaintiff:
D. J. and BRITTANI PIERCE
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
SMITH v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00184
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
ZADRIAN JAQUAE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
