U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Social Security Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 862
HILL v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv00533
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Plaintiff:
BRANDON HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
BROWN v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00512
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
MELODY FAIRY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PICKETT v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00500
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
KIM PICKETT
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
HILL v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00463
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD RUSSELL HILL, III
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
MILES v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00321
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
RODERICK L. MILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
BUMPERS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2021cv00318
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
GENEVA BUMPERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
FULP v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00310
Plaintiff:
RICHARD O. FULP, JR.
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
PERRYMAN v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00305
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY PERRYMAN
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GAMBOUR v. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES et al
as 1:2021cv00292
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES and ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
ARNJAD AHMED MOHAMED KHAIR GAMBOUR and AMJAD AHMED MOHAMED KHAIR GAMBOUR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FOX v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00293
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
MICHELE FOX
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
