US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Other Statutes Cases
Cases 211 - 220 of 2,216
WILSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2020cv00661
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
SAO v. NORTHSTAR LOCATION SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
MARY SAO
Defendant:
NORTHSTAR LOCATION SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
WILSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2020cv00562
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
FISHER v. FENNEC PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D. FISHER
Defendant:
FENNEC PHARMACEUTICALS INC., ROSTISLAV RAYKOV and ROBERT ANDRADE
SILVA v. SWIFT
as 1:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES SILVA
Defendant:
TAYLOR ALISON SWIFT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SILVA v. SWIFT et al
as 1:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES SILVA
Defendant:
TAYLOR ALISON SWIFT and NASHVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ARTICUL8, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant:
ARTICUL8, LLC and PAUL K TALBOT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. LOST JEWEL INVESTMENTS, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
LOST JEWEL INVESTMENTS, LLC doing business as SIPPI'S BAR & GRILL and JOSEPH LEE COPELAND
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication/Use of Communications
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. TORRES
as 1:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
ANTONIO CRUZ TORRES doing business as CAFE CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication/Use of Communications
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
