US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,194
SELLERS v. YOUTUBE LLC
as 1:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
TYQASHIA SELLERS
Defendant:
YOUTUBE LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SELLERS v. THE UNITED STATES
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
TYQASHIA SELLERS
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BENNETT v. DORMAN et al
as 1:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE BENNETT
Defendant:
JIMMY DORMAN and S.J LETILI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BENNETT v. WOOTEN et al
as 1:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE BENNETT
Defendant:
SERGEANT WOOTEN and OFFICER HINTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RENZI v. NAPHCARE, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER RENZI
Defendant:
NAPHCARE, INC., BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, JR., BRIAN L. GILROY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
JONES v. DEJOY
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY JONES
Defendant:
LOUIS DEJOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
FREEMAN v. KIM et al
as 1:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE E. FREEMAN
Defendant:
SGT. KIM, SGT. LAURA and LUETENANT KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BLAKELY v. WESTERN SURETY COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Larry Gray Blakley, Sr.
Defendant:
WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, SERGEANT Joshua Mabe, Deputy Cody Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
R.M. et al v. MINA CHARTER SCHOOL OF LEE COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Rylee Ann Holmes, Dawn Rachell Henderson and R.M.
Defendant:
MINA Charter School of Lee County, MINA Charter School of Lee County Board of Directors, Dr. Shawn Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
TEASLEY v. O'BRIEN
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
KENYA TEASLEY
Defendant:
ELIZABETH O'BRIEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
