North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 60
Burke v. Lassiter
as 5:2012cv00137
Petitioner:
Rayford Lewis Burke
Respondent:
Kenneth E. Lassiter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HURST v. BRANKER
as 1:2010cv00725
Petitioner:
JASON WAYNE HURST
Respondent:
GERALD BRANKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING v. BRANKER et al
as 1:2010cv00382
Plaintiff:
JAMES DONALD KING
Respondent:
GERALD BRANKER and ROY A. COOPER, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COMPTON v. WATKINS et al
as 1:2010cv00312
Plaintiff:
TRAE JAVAR COMPTON
Defendant:
K. WATKINS, C. REID, M. KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Branker
as 1:2009cv00416
Petitioner:
James Lewis Morgan
Respondent:
Gerald Branker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Forte v. Branker et al
as 5:2009hc02054
Petitioner:
Linwood Earl Forte and Linwood Earl Forte
Respondent:
Gerald Branker and Roy Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Summers
as 1:2009cv00162
Petitioner:
Willie James White
Respondent:
Lynn Summers and The Attorney General of the State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lawrence v. Cooper et al
as 5:2009ct03055
Plaintiff:
Jimmie W Lawrence, Jimmie W Lawrence and Jimmie W Lawrence
Defendant:
Roy A. Cooper, III, Gail E. Dawson, Sandra W Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fowler et al
as 3:2009cv00051
Petitioner:
Elrico Darnell Fowler, Elrico Darnell Fowler and Elrico Darnell Fowler
Respondent:
Gerald Branker
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Richardson v. Branker
as 5:2008hc02163
Petitioner:
Timothy Richardson
Respondent:
Gerald Branker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
