US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 81,263
Savel v. MetroHealth System
as 5:2022cv02154
Plaintiff:
Frank Savel
Defendant:
The MetroHealth System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Hall, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv02156
Plaintiff:
George Leslie Hall, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Burns-Sgambati v. Visit Healthcare, Inc., et al.
as 1:2022cv02157
Plaintiff:
Tracey Burns-Sgambati
Defendant:
Visit Healthcare, Inc. and VisiGene, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jack v. Tipsord et al
as 3:2022cv02161
Plaintiff:
Todd M. Jack
Defendant:
Michael Tipsord and State Farm Automobile Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States of America v. Republic Steel
as 5:2022cv02163
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Republic Steel
Knott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv02149
Plaintiff:
Michelle Sharee Knott
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Wright v. Ady et al
as 1:2022cv02150
Plaintiff:
Ruth J Wright
Defendant:
Deputy Justin Ady, Richland County Board of Commissioners and Richland County Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
