US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 2,004
Prather v. Christian
as 6:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Natalie Prather
Defendant:
John Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Garland et al
as 6:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Joseph Patrick Calhoun
Defendant:
Terry Garland, April Lentz, Mike Self and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2023cv00171
Petitioner:
Darvin W. Gray
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ritesman v. Ashton
as 6:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Cody Hawke Ritesman
Defendant:
Ashton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaquez v. Schrum et al
as 6:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Henry Joseph Jaquez
Defendant:
Chris Schrum, Johnny Dallis, Sylvia Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenuine v. Tuggle
as 6:2023cv00157
Petitioner:
Jacob Benjamin Jenuine
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma
Respondent:
Terry Tuggle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Farrow v. Harpe
as 6:2023cv00158
Petitioner:
James Allen Farrow and James Alan Farrow
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Busby v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Kenton Busby
Defendant:
The State of Oklahoma and State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ritesman v. Summers
as 6:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Cody Hawke Ritesman
Defendant:
Ron Summers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Buss
as 6:2023cv00146
Petitioner:
Thomas Jesse Ward
Respondent:
David Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
