US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 1,999
Root v. USA
as 6:2023cv00322
Petitioner:
Levi Cody Root, Sr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Smith-Shuman v. Pittsburg County
as 6:2023cv00321
Petitioner:
Alice M. Smith-Shuman
Respondent:
Pittsburg County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Halliwell v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Phoebe Renee Halliwell
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Terry Tuggle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00318
Petitioner:
Raymond A. Ray
Respondent:
Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weber v. Louie et al
as 6:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Douglas Clinton Weber
Defendant:
Anthony Louie and Amanda Wendell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LeBlanc v. Bridges
as 6:2023cv00301
Petitioner:
Charles Leslie LeBlanc
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ivey v. Tuggle
as 6:2023cv00285
Petitioner:
Douglas Edward Ivey and Ronnie Gilmore
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Terry Tuggle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Westbrook v. Lysinger et al
as 6:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
Frederick Maurice Westbrook and Maurice
Defendant:
Jamie Lysinger, Serena Brewer, Joe Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawton v. Bridges
as 6:2023cv00272
Petitioner:
Theodoric B. Lawton
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Truitt v. Morgan et al
as 6:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Jessie Truitt,III and Jessie Truitt, III
Defendant:
Jeanne Morgan and Patti Stem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
