US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,999
McCoy v. Sipes et al
as 6:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
Jimmie McCoy, III
Defendant:
B Sipes, Lt. Lysinger, C.O. Musile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kasper v. Atwood et al
as 6:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Nathan Robert Frank Kasper
Defendant:
Devra Atwood, Clay Linter, Jenny Saunders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2023cv00396
Petitioner:
Joshua Duane Butler
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Rainbolt
as 6:2023cv00397
Plaintiff:
Joshua Duane Butler
Defendant:
Carmen Rainbolt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stubbs v. USA
as 6:2023cv00393
Petitioner:
John Duncan Stubbs
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Gaines v. Spitner et al
as 6:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Trevon D. Gaines
Defendant:
Mrs. Spitner, Mrs. Birdshead, Mr. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00385
Petitioner:
Jeremy Wright
Respondent:
Gentre Drummond and Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ree v. USA
as 6:2023cv00386
Petitioner:
Miranda Lynne Ree
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Nicholson v. Hamilton
as 6:2023cv00377
Petitioner:
Bryan Douglas Nicholson
Respondent:
Casey Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joice v. Rogers
as 6:2023cv00376
Petitioner:
Brian Fredrick Joice
Respondent:
Mike Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
