US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 2,010
Fish v. Bennet
as 6:2023cv00136
Petitioner:
Brandis N. Fish
Respondent:
Bennet and Kimberly Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Thomas v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Nor T. Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Mark Knutson, David Louthan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hope v. Smith
as 6:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Hope
Defendant:
Shannon Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hand v. Smith
as 6:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hand
Defendant:
Shannon Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis v. Bridges
as 6:2023cv00130
Petitioner:
Lance A. Dennis
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDermott v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
David Bruce McDermott, II
Defendant:
Shannon Smith, Chris Hauger, Julie Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steele et al v. Smith
as 6:2023cv00124
Petitioner:
Mike Steele, Jacob Sewell, Aubrey Cole and others
Respondent:
Shannon Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Florie v. Smith
as 6:2023cv00122
Petitioner:
Dondrea Jammal Florie, Sr.
Respondent:
Shannon Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Meza v. Quick et al
as 6:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Miguel Meza
Defendant:
Christey Quick, Terri Apala and James Pettit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDermott v. Smith
as 6:2023cv00118
Petitioner:
David Bruce McDermott, II
Respondent:
Shannon Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
