US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma

Cases filed
Cases 31 - 40 of 27,920
Holz v. Linsay
as 5:2024cv00437
Plaintiff: Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant: Terry Linsay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnett v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00439
Petitioner: Christopher J Barnett
Respondent: Cynthia Smith, Carrie Bridges and John Masquelier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coomes v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2024cv00435
Plaintiff: Colin Coomes
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Holz v. LNU et al
as 5:2024cv00438
Plaintiff: Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant: FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Kelly et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00018
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Harris v. US Government Wide
as 5:2024cv00431
Plaintiff: Latoya S Harris
Defendant: US Government Wide
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Runnels v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00432
Plaintiff: Savortae Runnels
Defendant: GEO Group Inc, Emily Timms, FNU Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leach v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00433
Petitioner: Nicholas J Leach
Respondent: Cynthia Smith, Carrie Bridges and John Masquelier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Mars et al
as 5:2024cv00434
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant: Jenifer Mars, City of Lawton doing business as Lawton Animal Welfare and Lawton Humane Society and Animal Shelter Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
GRAHAM v. BIDEN et al
as 5:2024cv00426
Petitioner: Jonathan Graham
Respondent: Joe Biden, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?