District Court Cases in Oregon
Cases 21 - 30 of 51,465
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hickman v. Kruger et al
as 2:2025cv00525
Plaintiff:
Jerrin Lavazie Hickman
Defendant:
John Kruger, Brian Gaither, Jane/John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Boisvent
as 3:2025cv00529
Plaintiff:
Michael James Miles, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Boisvent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ice v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2025cv00524
Plaintiff:
Shelly R. Ice
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hamann v. Miller
as 2:2025cv00536
Petitioner:
Wesley Edwin Hamann
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Portland Branch Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 3:2025cv00534
Plaintiff:
Dontay North Anderson
Defendant:
Portland Branch Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Douglas A. Olson and Mike Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaca v. Boisvert
as 3:2025cv00535
Plaintiff:
McAnthony Vaca
Defendant:
Dr. B. Boisvert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2025cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
