District of Oregon Court Cases

Cases filed


Cases 31 - 40 of 33,497
LaFary v. Spirit Leatherworks, LLC
as 6:2017cv00447
Plaintiff: Maria LaFary
Defendant: Spirit Leatherworks, LLC
Cause Of Action: Fair Labor Standards Act - Denial of Overtime Compensation
David Edeli
as 3:2017ad00094
In Re: David Edeli
Cause Of Action: Cause Code Unknown
Type: Contract Insurance
Billotte v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2017cv00445
Plaintiff: Barbie Billotte
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Page v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv00444
Plaintiff: June Amorosa Page
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CKH Family Limited Partnership v. Holt Homes, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00441
Plaintiff: CKH Family Limited Partnership, Van Shaw, Maya Waldemar
Defendant: Clackamas Homes Inc., Holt Homes Inc., Greg H. Kubicek and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal
Johnson v. Peters et al
as 3:2017cv00460
Defendant: Kevin Foley, Darryl Glenn, C. Peters
Plaintiff: Kevin Johnson
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Klingensmith v. Tillamook County District Attorneys Office et al
as 3:2017cv00461
Petitioner: David Christopher Klingensmith
Respondent: Oregon Judicial Department, Tillamook City Police, Tillamook County District Attorneys Office and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newsome v. Amsberry
as 2:2017cv00446
Respondent: Brigitte Amsberry
Petitioner: Ryan C. Newsome
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David B. Shapiro
as 3:2017ad00095
In Re: David B. Shapiro
Cause Of Action: Cause Code Unknown
Type: Contract Insurance
Guerrero v. Snake River Correction
as 2:2017cv00459
Petitioner: Rafael M Guerrero
Respondent: Snake River Correction
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?