US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 3,311
CAPALDO et al v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2023cv01287
Plaintiff:
EDWARD CAPALDO and NATOSHA CAPALDO
Defendant:
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE OFFICER KYLE YEAGER, OFFICER DEFENDANTS 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLOWER v. ROSCIOLI et al
as 5:2023cv01283
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW FLOWER
Defendant:
PAULA ROSCIOLI, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS SECTION and NORTHAMPTON COUNTY COURT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JACOBS v. BERMUDAZ
as 2:2023cv01197
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JACOBS
Defendant:
DONALD BERMUDEZ BERMUDAZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES-CHAMBERS v. RATHFON
as 2:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO JONES-CHAMBERS
Defendant:
DETECTIVE ANDREW RATHFON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HILL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv01002
Plaintiff:
MARVIN HILL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and PHILIP NORDO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROYE v. HULMES
as 2:2023cv00987
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND ROYE
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HULMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROOKS v. PENNYPACKER et al
as 5:2023cv00961
Plaintiff:
NATASHA L BROOKS
Defendant:
MASON PENNYPACKER, HUDSON HUGHES and MANHEIM BOROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MEDINA v. DET. SAL APRILE et al
as 5:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM OMAR MEDINA
Defendant:
ALLENTOWN POLICE DEPT, DET. SAL APRILE, SGT. ERIC STAUFFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: GARDNER
as 2:2023cv00969
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY GARDNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SUTTON v. HULMES
as 2:2023cv00860
Plaintiff:
TODD SUTTON
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HULMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
