US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 71 - 80 of 323,513
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MEDDICC LTD. v. 01 CONSULTING LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01836
Plaintiff:
MEDDICC LTD.
Defendant:
01 CONSULTING LLC doing business as MEDDIC ACADEMY and DARIUS LAHOUTIFARD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
BAILEY v. LCIJ, INC.
as 2:2024cv01820
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE ANNETTE BAILEY
Defendant:
LCIJ, INC. doing business as NATIONAL TENANT NETWORK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
HERRING v. KAUFFMAN
as 2:2024cv01867
Plaintiff:
TARAY HERRING
Defendant:
EARL G. KAUFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAYNOR v. COMCAST CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv01842
Plaintiff:
GILBERT RYAN RAYNOR
Defendant:
COMCAST CORPORATION and DREAMWORKS ANIMATION STUDIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE: QUINZEL CAIBY
as 2:2024cv01844
Plaintiff:
QUINZEL CAIBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lisenby v. OLYMPUS CORPORATION OF THE AMERICAS et al
as 5:2024cv01803
Plaintiff:
Paul Lisenby
Defendant:
OLYMPUS CORPORATION OF THE AMERICAS, OLYMPUS AMERICA INC. and GYRUS ACMI, INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01804
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
DAY v. OMALLEY
as 5:2024cv01807
Plaintiff:
MEGAN ALANA DAY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
INTERNET RESEARCH BUREAU L.L.C. v. OPTIMAL STRATEGIX GROUP, INC.
as 2:2024cv01790
Plaintiff:
INTERNET RESEARCH BUREAU L.L.C.
Defendant:
OPTIMAL STRATEGIX GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
