US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 17,727
Tejada v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Ricky Tejada
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Yoder et al
as 1:2024cv00723
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Defendant:
Lieutenant Yoder, C.O. Lazicki and Hearing Examiner Yodis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carey v. USA
as 3:2024cv00722
Petitioner:
Jesse Carey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Green v. Warden, USP Canaan
as 1:2024cv00720
Petitioner:
Reginald Edward Green
Respondent:
Warden USP Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s
Cooper v. SCI-Muncy et al
as 3:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Cooper
Defendant:
SCI-Muncy, Wendy Nickolas, C.O. Kurtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper et al v. SCI-Muncy et al
as 3:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn M Cooper and B.L.D.C.
Defendant:
SCI-Muncy, Warden Nicholas, ADA Foose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene v. The Parole Board of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 3:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
Michael Greene
Defendant:
The Parole Board Of The Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodloe v. Matevousion et al
as 4:2024cv00695
Petitioner:
Ronald E. Goodloe
Respondent:
Andre Matevousion, Warden Thomas E. Bargami and B. Potes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whitfield v. Christensen
as 1:2024cv00685
Petitioner:
Jesse Whitfield
Respondent:
Warden Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whitfield v. Christensen
as 3:2024cv00685
Petitioner:
Jesse Whitfield
Respondent:
Warden Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
