US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Labor Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 482
Reitzi v. Vans Express Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01514
Plaintiff:
Patricia Reitzi
Defendant:
Vans Express Inc. and DHL Express (USA) Inc. doing business as DHL Express
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pierce v. Monro, Inc.
as 3:2021cv01481
Plaintiff:
Matthew Pierce
Defendant:
Monro, Inc. d/b/a Mr. Tire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Allen et al
as 4:2021cv01270
Plaintiff:
Colin Smith
Defendant:
Eric Allen and Green Valley Motors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
McGovern v. Burgit's Electric City Taxi, Inc.
as 3:2021cv01235
Plaintiff:
Kevin McGovern
Defendant:
Burgit's Electric City Taxi, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Violation of Fair Labor Act of 1938
Xue et al v. John's Shanghai LLC et al
as 4:2021cv01203
Plaintiff:
Jian Zhong Xue and Raymond Chow
Defendant:
John's Shanghai LLC d/b/a John's Shanghai and Yun Xue
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ortiz et al v. Freight Rite, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01060
Defendant:
Capital Delivery Systems, Inc, JLPDA, Inc, Freight Rite, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
James Ortiz and Colby Ness
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hart v. Government Employees Insurance Company
as 4:2021cv00859
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company d/b/a Geico
Plaintiff:
Susan Olivia Hart
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kauffman v. Mid-Atlantic Storage, Inc. Systems
as 1:2021cv00775
Defendant:
Mid-Atlantic Storage, Inc. Systems
Plaintiff:
Michael Kauffman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Glessner v. Central Dauphin School District Authority
as 1:2021cv00721
Plaintiff:
Gary Glessner
Defendant:
Central Dauphin School District Authority
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Zhou v. Lu, et al
as 4:2021cv00682
Defendant:
Mrs. Yang Lu, Yang Lu and Wei Yu
Plaintiff:
Zhiqiong Zhou
Not Classified By Court:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
