US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Civil Rights Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 141
GREENE v. SOKOL
as 2:2013cv00249
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA GREENE
Defendant:
ELAM SOKOL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALTOONA HOUSING AUTHORITY
as 3:2012cv00255
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALTOONA HOUSING AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
ACKERMAN v. MERCY BEHAVIOR HEALTH et al
as 2:2012cv01807
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAMES ACKERMAN
Defendant:
RAY WOLF and MERCY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SWANSON
as 1:2012cv00310
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILLIAM SWANSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
DEFIORE v. CITY RESCUE MISSION OF NEW CASTLE et al
as 2:2012cv01590
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DEFIORE
Defendant:
CITY RESCUE MISSION OF NEW CASTLE and JAMES HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
WAMBOLDT v. AURORA PITTSBURGH, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv01280
Plaintiff:
HARRY WAMBOLDT
Defendant:
AURORA PITTSBURGH, LLC and JODI PECZE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MITCHELL v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2012cv00964
Plaintiff:
JUANITA MITCHELL
Defendant:
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH and STANFORD WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNYDER v. RMWS LIMITED et al
as 2:2012cv00912
Plaintiff:
SHANNI SNYDER
Defendant:
RMWS LIMITED, SCALISE CONSTRUCTION, INC., WILLIAM SCALISE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SANTIAGO v. THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ERIE
as 1:2012cv00074
Plaintiff:
MARIA SANTIAGO
Defendant:
THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ERIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SHERMAN v. URBAN FRANKLIN TOWERS, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00038
Plaintiff:
DARLENE SHERMAN
Defendant:
URBAN FRANKLIN TOWERS, LLC , URBAN INNOVATOINS, LTD and KRISTINA CRAWFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
