US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Civil Rights Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 141
SNYDER et al v. SUMMERSET NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2011cv01309
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SNYDER and JAIME SNYDER
Defendant:
SUMMERSET NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION and SUMMERSET DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. MENHORN
as 2:2011cv01175
Plaintiff:
PATTY A. SMITH
Defendant:
BETTY MENHORN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HICKLIN v. PRESTON
as 3:2011cv00188
Plaintiff:
BRENDA HICKLIN
Defendant:
STEVEN PRESTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SNYDER v. DAUGHERTY et al
as 2:2011cv00879
Plaintiff:
SHANNI SNYDER
Defendant:
MICHAEL DAUGHERTY , DAVID BERTOK , ROBERT RIZZO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MORTGAGE GUARANTY INSURANCE CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv00882
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MORTGAGE GUARANTY INSURANCE CORP., ELGINA CUNNINGHAM and KELLY KANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PONDEXTER v. THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2011cv00857
Plaintiff:
EARL A. PONDEXTER
Defendant:
THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY, THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, DAN ONORATO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BROOKER v. ALTOONA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 3:2011cv00095
Plaintiff:
JOSEPHINE BROOKER
Defendant:
ALTOONA HOUSING AUTHORITY, CHERYL JOHNS, LINDA WALTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SHAW v. STONY CREEK COMMONS et al
as 3:2011cv00059
Plaintiff:
EDWARD SHAW, JR.
Defendant:
STONY CREEK COMMONS, WHIPPLE ALLEN and JULIE FOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PHILLIPS et al v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2011cv00126
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY PHILLIPS and ERIC D. REED
Defendant:
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH and A. FULTON MEACHEM, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SINGLETON v. SMITH
as 2:2011cv00093
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY SINGLETON
Defendant:
LINDA A. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
