US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,150
MATOS v. BRIGHT et al
as 2:2023cv02039
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MATOS
Defendant:
MR. J. BRIGHT and MS. LAURENE DONNELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DRUMMOND v. HUTCHINSON et al
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
KEITH DRUMMOND
Defendant:
WARDEN J. HUTCHINSON, FCI McKEAN FACILITIES DEPARTMENT HEAD, COMPOUND SUPERVISING OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 1:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
LARRY SIMMONS, JR.
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MARK BILETNIKOFF, SUSAN STROMEYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BLAUSER v. QUIMBY
as 2:2023cv02028
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JEFFREY BLAUSER
Defendant:
CALEB QUIMBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
NELSON v. RARDIN
as 3:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NELSON
Defendant:
B. RARDIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LOPEZ MARTINEZ v. LECHLEITNER et al
as 3:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
JUAN MIGUEL LOPEZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
PATRICK "P.J." LECHLEITNER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
NELSON v. ABBOTT
as 3:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NELSON
Defendant:
D. ABBOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HEATH v. BUTLER COUNTY PRISON
as 2:2023cv01998
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS T. HEATH
Defendant:
BUTLER COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SLOTCAVAGE v. WELLPATH HEALTHCARE
as 1:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
KEITH SLOTCAVAGE
Defendant:
WELLPATH HEALTHCARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
NARANJO v. COULEHAN et al
as 2:2023cv01983
Plaintiff:
ISAAC NARANJO
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER COULEHAN, HURD, WITTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
