US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 4,262
CARULLI v. TIBBS
as 2:2023cv02030
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY R. CARULLI
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER JOHN TIBBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LOPEZ MARTINEZ v. LECHLEITNER et al
as 3:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
JUAN MIGUEL LOPEZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
PATRICK "P.J." LECHLEITNER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
NELSON v. RARDIN
as 3:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NELSON
Defendant:
B. RARDIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMIREZ v. ERIE COUNTY PRISON et al
as 1:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
RAMONE RAMIREZ
Defendant:
ERIE COUNTY PRISON, DEPUTY WARDEN HOLMAN and COUNSELOR HEATHER MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
NELSON v. ABBOTT
as 3:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NELSON
Defendant:
D. ABBOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HEATH v. BUTLER COUNTY PRISON
as 2:2023cv01998
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS T. HEATH
Defendant:
BUTLER COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SLOTCAVAGE v. WELLPATH HEALTHCARE
as 1:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
KEITH SLOTCAVAGE
Defendant:
WELLPATH HEALTHCARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
NARANJO v. COULEHAN et al
as 2:2023cv01983
Plaintiff:
ISAAC NARANJO
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER COULEHAN, HURD, WITTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTELLA v. TRINITY FOOD SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
JHEN SCUTELLA
Defendant:
TRINITY FOOD SERVICES, WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, DEPUTY WARDEN BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GARDLEY v. WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv00321
Petitioner:
JEROME KEON GARDLEY
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, DOCTOR KOHLER, PA KANG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
