US District Court for the District of Rhode Island Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 927
Withers v. Cruz
as 1:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Tonya Withers
Defendant:
Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDaniel v. Preserve Property Management Company, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
Alison McDaniel
Defendant:
Preserve Property Management Company, LLC and Paul Mihailides
Counter Claimant:
The Preserve at Boulder Hills, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Withers v. McConnell
as 1:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Tonya Withers
Defendant:
Judge John J. McConnell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rhode Island Association of Coastal Taxpayers v. Neronha et al
as 1:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Rhode Island Association of Coastal Taxpayers
Defendant:
Peter Neronha, Jeffrey Willis and Terrence Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Withers v. Judge McHugh
as 1:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Tonya Withers
Defendant:
Judge McHugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Withers v. Judge Darigan
as 1:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
Tonya Withers
Defendant:
Judge Darigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Withers v. Judge Cruze
as 1:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
Tonya Withers
Defendant:
Judge Cruze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Landry v. Pawtucket Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Norman J. Landry, Jr.
Defendant:
Pawtucket Police Department, Cranston Police Department and Gateway Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Voccola et al
as 1:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Ezekial Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Joseph J. Voccola and Joseph J. Voccola and Associates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Depina v. Cambell et al
as 1:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
Laurinda Depina
Defendant:
Daniel E. Cambell, Brian Person, Anthony Troy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
