South Dakota Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 119
Natural Dakota, LLC v. Dakota Naturals Pet Snacks, LLC
as 1:2021cv01010
Plaintiff:
Natural Dakota, LLC
Defendant:
Dakota Naturals Pet Snacks, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Edland v. Basin Electric Power Cooperative
as 4:2021cv04008
Plaintiff:
Travis Edland
Defendant:
Basin Electric Power Cooperative
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Vidyashev v. Riverfront Broadcasting, LLC
as 5:2020cv05046
Defendant:
Duhamel Broadcasting Enterprises and Riverfront Broadcasting, LLC
Plaintiff:
Igor Vidyashev
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Miss Rodeo America, Inc. v. Miss Rodeo South Dakota Pagent, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv05035
Plaintiff:
Miss Rodeo America, Inc.
Defendant:
Jr Miss Rodeo South Dakota, Inc. and Miss Rodeo South Dakota Pagent, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Medical Inflatable Exhibits, Inc. v. Sanford Health
as 5:2019cv05084
Defendant:
Sanford Health
Plaintiff:
Medical Inflatable Exhibits, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Wright v. Lawrence
as 4:2019cv04149
Defendant:
Kelvin Lawrence
Plaintiff:
Jon Q. Wright
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Golden Rule Fasteners, Inc. v. Bramec Corp.
as 4:2019cv04069
Plaintiff:
Golden Rule Fasteners, Inc.
Defendant:
Bramec Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Golden Rule Construction Co., Inc. v. Golden Rule Home Services, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv04014
Plaintiff:
Golden Rule Construction Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Golden Rule Home Services, LLC and Alan Gentry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Dodd v. Jenkins et al
as 5:2018cv05084
Defendant:
Sam Jenkins and LEAPS Program
Plaintiff:
Brian Dodd
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Kustom Cycles, Inc. et al v. Dragonfly Cycle Concepts, LLC et al
as 5:2018cv05024
Plaintiff:
Kustom Cycles, Inc. and Brian Klock
Defendant:
Dragonfly Cycle Concepts, LLC and Kevin Michael Martin
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
